Changes in objective characteristics in brain electrical activity in newborns as a function of birth weight

Year & Volume - Issue: 
Authors: 
Anastasiya E. Runnova, Yuliya A. Zhuravleva, Evgeniy N. Egorov, Evgeniya E. Drozhdeva
Article type: 
CID: 
e0407
PDF File: 
Abstract: 
The aim of the present study was to detect characteristic features of oscillatory electrical activity of the brain in the first day of postnatal life depending on the weight of newborns. Material — Eighteen neonates of conditionally normal gestational age (37.7±1.5 weeks) weighing 2500±720 g were included in the study. All neonates were children of first births of mothers aged 18-35 years, all pregnancies were physiologic, conventionally normal, without significant complications. The height of the newborns was 47±4.643 cm and head circumference was33.0±2.908 cm. The Apgar score at delivery was 7-9 points. All newborns were divided among groups 1 (weight: 2850-4000 gr), 2 (weight: 2000-2800 gr) and 3 (1200-2000 gr). Each newborn underwent EEG monitoring (EEG, monopolar recording, channels C3 and C4) for 40 minutes during the first 12 hours after birth. Methods — Automatic processing of EEG was performed without separating the monitoring records into sleep and wakefulness stages. Oscillatory patterns were calculated for each EEG channel based on the continuous wavelet transform method. Statistical estimations of the number and duration of oscillatory patterns developing in different EEG frequency ranges were performed. Results — A strong correlation was found between neonatal birth weight and integral characteristics of the number \ duration of oscillatory patterns in the low-frequency band [4; 6] Hz (r=-0.878\0.920). Practically healthy newborns with different birth weights show statistically different EEG characteristics in the [4; 6] Hz band in the first 12 hours after birth (p-value≤0.005). Conclusion — Electrical activity of the brain varies significantly depending on the weight of newborns immediately after birth. Monitoring of EEG signals according to the proposed algorithm may become the basis for the development of additional tools for early detection of possible disorders of neurological development of the newborn.
Cite as: 
Runnova AE, Zhuravleva YuA, Egorov EN, Drozhdeva EE. Changes in objective characteristics in brain electrical activity in newborns as a function of birth weight. Russian Open Medical Journal 2023; 12: e0407.

Introduction

The research presented in our paper is aimed at studying the brain development of newborns at the very beginning of postnatal life. At this time, the infant brain undergoes dramatic changes that are quite difficult to study objectively in vivo. Despite the considerable fundamental interest in brain development in the early postnatal period, the study also has clear applied goals. Objective criteria of norms and abnormalities in the condition of the newborn can help early help and rehabilitation of the child even before the development of neurological disorders. For today's developed society, the challenges of increasing average parental age and the number of preterm births, resulting in a higher proportion of low-birth-weight babies, lead to a significant interest in objective decision support tools for clinical professionals, both to monitor the care of low-birth-weight babies and to reduce the risks of neurologic impairment and early detection of possible cognitive impairment. Despite all the advances in clinical neonatology, the number of children demonstrating neurologic impairment is increasing. For example, the Center for Disease Control (USA) reports that the incidence of autism spectrum disorders has increased from 1 case per 166 8-year-old children in 2004 to 1:36 in 2023 [1]. Correct non-invasive methods of early assessment of neurophysiologic state of the brain of newborns could be useful to study the possibility of creating prognostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders, speech disorders, intellectual disability and others.

Today, in the clinical practice of working with newborns, EEG analysis is often based on the amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) method, which is based on a compressed one-dimensional representation of long-term recordings of two or more EEG channels together and allows, based on the identification of typical trends, a quick and relatively objective conclusion about the current state of cerebral function and an assessment of its dynamics. In addition, aEEG is used to develop fully automated methods of child monitoring, for example, in the assessment of brain maturation [2, 3] and the classification of sleep states [4, 5].

At the same time, the use of aEEG is obviously a significant simplification of the processes of brain activity, reducing the entire complex multi-frequency distributed oscillatory dynamics of electrical potentials to an average characteristic obtained from spatially distributed electrode points. Thus, although characteristic trends of AEEG have been successfully identified for critical and convulsive states of premature infants, the markers of normal or slightly pathologic processes of development of brain electrical activity in the immediate period after birth in preterm and slightly premature low birth weight infants remain poorly studied.

Previously, in Kiselev, et al (2022), Zhuravlev, et al (2023) [6, 7], the team evaluated the occurrence and dynamics during the first weeks of life of electrophysiological markers of deep (quiet) and active sleep, as well as wakefulness of newborns of different gestational ages in terms of classical frequency-time analysis based on continuous wavelet transform (CWT). In this paper, we aim to study the characteristics of the electrical activity of the brain of premature newborns with conditionally normal gestational age and their relationship with birth weight. The study included 18 conditionally healthy newborns with different birth weights. The study of the number, duration and energy of CWT oscillatory patterns allows us to observe a pronounced correlation between the characteristics of neonatal brain activity and birth weight. Further study of the capabilities of the proposed method and its validation in longitudinal studies seems promising for the creation of automatic systems to support medical decisions for the early detection of damage to the development of the central nervous system of newborns.

 

Material and Methods

The first part of this section provides the necessary information about clinical studies in which procedures for recording electrical activity of the brain were carried out. Our research was carried out in accordance with the requirements of Declaration of Helsinki [8] and were approved by the Ethics Committee at State Medical University of Saratov, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Before the onset of the study, written informed consent for monitoring, subsequent mathematical processing of the data, and publication of the results was obtained from all parents (or legal guardians of participants). Parents were present during all experiments in compliance with the requirements of the Russian Federation legislation.

In the second part, all methods used for EEG processing are described. The use of these methods is aimed at searching for and quantifying differences in the oscillatory structure of the electrical activity of the brain in the first six hours after birth.

 

Clinical materials

The experimental material was collected during a clinical study, which included 18 newborns.

The inclusion criteria for the study were: gestational age at birth over 35 weeks, Apgar score over 7, and voluntary informed consent signed by the parents of a newborn child. To improve the statistical significance of intergroup differences and to reduce an impact of lurking variables, solely naturally born children (i.e., without any surgical interventions) were included in our study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: grade 3 intraventricular hemorrhage with a breakthrough into the brain substance, presence of a genetic pathology, and gross congenital malformations. All newborns underwent a complete clinical examination in accordance with the neonatology standards for the provision of medical care.

All newborns were divided among groups 1 (weight: 2850-4000 gr), 2 (weight: 2000-2800 gr) and 3 (1200-2000 gr). Table 1 presents a brief description of the results of examination of newborns by a neonatologist, as well as statistical characteristics of the all-patient data, and for each group.

 

Table 1. Physical characteristics of newborns and statistical estimation

#

Group

Sex

Gestational age, weeks

Weight, gr

Height, cm

Head circumference, cm

1

1

M

40.6

4000

53

38

2

1

M

39.0

3550

52

36

3

1

M

39.5

3250

51

36

4

1

M

40.4

3100

51

35

5

1

M

37.5

3000

50

36

6

1

F

38.5

2880

46

34

7

2

M

38.0

2800

52

36

8

2

M

37.0

2650

45

33

9

2

M

37.1

2630

48

35

10

2

M

36.4

2450

49

33

11

2

M

35.0

2323

48

33

12

2

M

38.5

2280

46

32

13

3

M

36.5

1970

46

30

14

3

M

36.3

1930

46

32

15

3

F

37.0

1920

37

30

16

3

M

37.9

1900

44

30

17

3

F

38.0

1500

41

30

18

3

M

36.6

1220

38

27

Statistical description:

All newborn

Mean

37.8

2519.6

46.8

33.1

Median

37.7

2540.0

47.0

33.0

Standard deviation

1.5

720.1

4.7

2.9

Group # 1

Mean

39.2

3296.7

50.5

35.8

Median

39.3

3175.0

51.0

36.0

Standard deviation

1.2

415.1

2.4

1.3

Group # 2

Mean

37.0

2522.2

48.0

33.7

Median

37.1

2540.0

48.0

33.0

Standard deviation

1.2

204.3

2.5

1.5

Group # 3

Mean

37.0

1740.0

42.0

29.8

Median

36.8

1910.0

42.5

30.0

Standard deviation

0.7

308.2

3.9

1.6

M, male; F, female.

 

Each child underwent a noninvasive and painless functional monitoring procedure at 8 h after the birth. The duration D of monitoring session was about D=40-45 min. During the monitoring, each child was located in the crib. Monitoring of newborns was carried out at the clinical departments for newborns within the framework of scientific and clinical cooperation with SSMU. The data of 2-channel noninvasive monitoring of biomedical EEG signals were recorded using the Encephalan-EEGR-19/26 electroencephalograph (Medicom MTD LLC, Russia). All signals were sampled at 512 Hz and digitized at 16 bits for offline analysis using a personal computer. EEGs were obtaned via conventional monopolar recording method with two reference points and C3 and C4 electrodes arranged according to the 10–20 layout [9]. Signals were recorded using Ag/AgCl electrodes in pre-mounted head units. Two reference electrodes, A1 and A2, were located on the mastoid processes, while the ground electrode N was placed above the forehead. The EEG signals were filtered by a band pass filter with cutoff points of 0.5 Hz and 40 Hz, and a notch filter of 50 Hz.

During the monitoring, the following behavioral activities were recorded among the newborns: sleep (5), drowsiness (10), quiet wakefulness (10), wakefulness with single movements (5), wakefulness with vocalization (3), and transitions between wakefulness and sleep states (18). Further processing was performed on the entire electroencephalography recording without singling out specific behavioral states.

 

EEG data processing

To study the frequency-time characteristics of electroencephalography, the classical continuous wavelet transform (CWT) was used to estimate the power dynamics of oscillatory activity in different frequency intervals with good temporal resolution [10]. The continuous wavelet transform W(ft) was calculated for each EEG signal xi based on the Morlet mother wavelet with the parameter Ω0=2π:

 

,   (1)

 

where “*” – complex conjugation procedure.

Using this value of the parameter Ω0, the time scales of the CWT can be represented in the classical frequencies of the Fourier spectrum f, Hz. The following processing algorithm was used to analyze the oscillatory activity on the EEG.

1). For each EEG channel, the energy power E (f, t) in band [1.0; 20] Hz was calculated according to:

 

  ,    (2)

 

The method of oscillatory patterns estimation is based on a special sorting of local extrema, i. e., skeletons.

2). At each time instant t0, a set of frequencies fj, where j=1, 2, ..., m, corresponding to a local maximum E (fj, t0) (2) is compiled. Here, the ordinal number j characterizes only the ordinal number of extrema and is not related in any way to the amplitude of the value E (fj, t0) (2). Thus, in the process of analyzing the full duration of the investigated signal, a set of frequencies  is formed, where n is the duration of the experimental signal, i. e., the number of time samples in the record.

3). The condition of oscillatory activity pattern development is introduced into consideration. For this purpose, at each time interval [ti; ti+1] for each frequency fj the following condition must be fulfilled:

 

,    (3)
 

where — is the set of frequencies for which the local maximum E (ft) (2) is observed at time step ti, and  is the similar set of frequencies with the local maximum E (f, (t + ∆t)) (2) for the next time step ti+1, and δ is a numerical constant. The choice of the δ -constant value is based on the sampling frequency of the analyzed signal and should exceed ∆t by 1-2 orders of magnitude, which allows to minimize the loss of information about frequency patterns existing in the studied signal, as well as to reduce the influence of numerical noise of the signal.

4). Condition (3) is checked for the extreme frequency at each time instant. If condition (3) is satisfied for the frequencies  and , then the activity at these frequencies during the time interval [ti, ti+1] will be considered as the development of a single oscillatory pattern. For simplicity of interpretation, we denote the values of frequencies and  as (Φ1) and (Φ2), respectively. For frequency (Φ2), we again check the fulfillment of condition (3) for the next time step ti+2. If the condition is also satisfied for this time step, the identified oscillatory pattern will continue further with a certain frequency (Φ 3).

5). The described actions should be cyclically repeated until the moment when condition (3) becomes incorrect, which will mean the end of the activity of this oscillatory pattern. Thus, each oscillatory pattern P can be described by a precisely defined frequency at each moment of time of its existence, i. e.:

 

,   (4)

 

where parameter m characterizes the time of “life” or existence of an oscillatory pattern P. Then the duration T of an individual pattern P can be defined as

 

,     (5)

 

In the case of equidistant experimental time series, the expression T=m∙∆t, where ∆t is the sampling time interval. Thus, the average frequency Φmd can be estimated for each frequency pattern P as follows:


,      (6)

 

6). The duration T and the average frequency Φmd of each pattern are independent values, which allows us to introduce an additional criterion for selecting correct oscillatory patterns P. Let the duration T of an oscillatory pattern P not exceed the period of oscillations of its average frequency Φmd:


,      (7)

 

In this case, the pattern P should be considered as a random noise interference and not taken into account in further signal analysis. This method was proposed and tested earlier [11-14]. Each detected pattern P is characterized by two characteristics: average frequency, Φmd, and duration, T.

7). To proceed to the description of the statistical characteristics of oscillatory patterns, we consider a set of bands: Δf1 [1, 2], Δf2 [2, 4], Δf3 [4, 6], Δf4 [6, 8], Δf5 [8, 10], Δf6 [10, 12], Δf7 [12, 14], Δf8 [14, 16], Δf9 [16, 18], Δf10 [18, 20] Hz. Within each frequency interval Δf at each time instant t, the number N of patterns whose mean frequency Φmd belongs to this interval, Φmd ϵ Δf, was calculated.

8). Then, the number of patterns N was averaged over the entire signal realization for time windows of duration ∆t=5 s in each frequency range. In addition, the average duration of the patterns, T, was estimated for the same time windows in a similar manner. Thus, each time interval ∆t of the EEG signal was described by 20 numerical characteristics, namely N, T for each frequency range Δf1f10.

9). The whole duration of the EEG signal can be described by averaged characteristics <N>, <T>:

 

 ,    (8)


estimated in each band Δf1 – Δf10.

10). Additionally, for integral estimation of brain electrical activity in sensorimotor projection, the total response for two registered symmetric EEG channels was calculated:

 

,   (9)

 

Statistical data processing

Mean, median, and standard deviation were used in descriptive statistics of collected data. The Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples was performed for the comparison of quantitative data. Calculation and graphing of distributions of N and T coefficients made in OriginLab version 6.1. The results with a p-value≤0.05 were assumed statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS version 22.0 software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

 

Results

The estimated number <N> and duration <T> of oscillatory patterns P for EEG channels C3 and C4 in each frequency band Δf1 f10 are given in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Standard statistical analysis of these characteristics for oscillatory patterns in the three groups of newborns showed that the maximum differences between brain electrical activity in newborns with different birth weights were observed in the frequency range Δf3 [4, 6] Hz, as shown in Figure 1.

 

Table 2. Estimations of the mean number of oscillatory patterns for EEG channels C3 and C4 over the entire monitoring period

Channel

Δf1

Δf2

Δf3

Δf4

Δf5

Δf6

Δf7

Δf8

Δf9

Δf10

1

C3

0.144277

0.342596

0.252892

0.273941

0.30786

0.305136

0.314807

0.343277

0.336194

0.356627

C4

0.172339

0.327737

0.277559

0.279962

0.305214

0.293202

0.31941

0.327054

0.326918

0.312312

2

C3

0.131251

0.316042

0.262922

0.27539

0.301259

0.291678

0.313304

0.358199

0.342869

0.353408

C4

0.128252

0.332339

0.264098

0.287322

0.303593

0.311864

0.334373

0.393492

0.397424

0.408136

3

C3

0.140621

0.322084

0.274238

0.278618

0.324649

0.3152

0.384989

0.531857

0.557775

0.610016

C4

0.163856

0.328083

0.292222

0.276616

0.306898

0.306491

0.342205

0.41214

0.433596

0.451793

4

C3

0.154156

0.314446

0.270781

0.276718

0.291124

0.296337

0.324873

0.394018

0.374949

0.390177

C4

0.167712

0.323437

0.289337

0.278905

0.315675

0.295792

0.363475

0.437423

0.435108

0.443143

5

C3

0.161946

0.289736

0.295162

0.278779

0.283634

0.272954

0.29362

0.341331

0.359223

0.356449

C4

0.159724

0.319586

0.288612

0.308561

0.340547

0.328842

0.347353

0.394583

0.402477

0.401116

6

C3

0.141344

0.301831

0.304277

0.267119

0.287186

0.291254

0.307254

0.384

0.390237

0.397288

C4

0.172693

0.272027

0.301403

0.244992

0.267965

0.260261

0.270766

0.317411

0.297381

0.290937

7

C3

0.1523

0.282379

0.278987

0.257067

0.27127

0.258895

0.274364

0.283645

0.268176

0.258051

C4

0.152859

0.294699

0.297071

0.261192

0.267646

0.280143

0.303351

0.318182

0.329854

0.34345

8

C3

0.159956

0.324177

0.298485

0.289094

0.309763

0.276176

0.301741

0.340223

0.327169

0.343351

C4

0.169311

0.29886

0.310516

0.273283

0.285933

0.26119

0.270364

0.292883

0.288018

0.277314

9

C3

0.136091

0.335288

0.28068

0.28661

0.307745

0.291655

0.326561

0.437415

0.448596

0.488819

C4

0.158464

0.329584

0.315711

0.293942

0.313593

0.306546

0.342594

0.425261

0.44586

0.47852

10

C3

0.166622

0.330133

0.321622

0.312821

0.327833

0.326751

0.386935

0.485664

0.511902

0.562213

C4

0.175179

0.329803

0.303463

0.328988

0.361711

0.345553

0.363747

0.410998

0.426341

0.494773

11

C3

0.15243

0.339854

0.31041

0.309228

0.29776

0.324744

0.408527

0.627766

0.724906

0.821236

C4

0.175202

0.320297

0.303504

0.274442

0.265216

0.259708

0.290278

0.38667

0.43762

0.488158

12

C3

0.15243

0.32106

0.31041

0.23417

0.22622

0.274477

0.346862

0.419386

0.419526

0.433194

C4

0.162414

0.321277

0.312947

0.268732

0.272963

0.285519

0.346936

0.40999

0.428279

0.43988

13

C3

0.166419

0.33553

0.314212

0.321006

0.323292

0.313609

0.355971

0.408822

0.417025

0.437735

C4

0.162392

0.301992

0.312905

0.284441

0.279426

0.268004

0.28263

0.317872

0.319961

0.330408

14

C3

0.166397

0.335181

0.31417

0.326798

0.348432

0.346539

0.389129

0.480665

0.490535

0.549351

C4

0.144277

0.339054

0.252892

0.342432

0.374459

0.358108

0.407838

0.484595

0.515811

0.557297

15

C3

0.172339

0.31613

0.277559

0.316534

0.314109

0.304406

0.348201

0.42757

0.437542

0.457351

C4

0.131251

0.32476

0.262922

0.325843

0.327873

0.324354

0.386896

0.518343

0.534859

0.596047

16

C3

0.128252

0.316173

0.264098

0.316577

0.314151

0.304447

0.348248

0.427628

0.437601

0.457412

C4

0.140621

0.32476

0.274238

0.325843

0.327873

0.324354

0.386896

0.518343

0.534859

0.596047

17

C3

0.163856

0.339679

0.292222

0.319833

0.346834

0.338869

0.339949

0.411098

0.414338

0.436074

C4

0.154156

0.334728

0.270781

0.337158

0.364827

0.373195

0.391011

0.481846

0.498178

0.535295

18

C3

0.167712

0.339633

0.289337

0.319789

0.346787

0.338823

0.339903

0.411042

0.414282

0.436015

C4

0.161946

0.334683

0.295162

0.337112

0.364777

0.373144

0.390958

0.481781

0.498111

0.535223

 

Table 3. Estimations of the mean duration of oscillatory patterns for EEG channels C3 and C4 over the entire monitoring period

Channel

Δf1

Δf2

Δf3

Δf4

Δf5

Δf6

Δf7

Δf8

Δf9

Δf10

1

C3

0.241215

0.189902

0.179171

0.079071

0.066564

0.052436

0.046834

0.041146

0.037551

0.032793

C4

0.273562

0.195762

0.159772

0.108804

0.069397

0.05339

0.049006

0.041283

0.03653

0.031436

2

C3

0.230723

0.205785

0.171124

0.112943

0.071681

0.054471

0.048214

0.043395

0.035691

0.031431

C4

0.266072

0.200431

0.158794

0.112727

0.075288

0.063899

0.051795

0.042622

0.031564

0.030497

3

C3

0.28565

0.202127

0.153393

0.120501

0.074669

0.060145

0.050986

0.037241

0.031459

0.030405

C4

0.285836

0.20864

0.154387

0.098184

0.067093

0.063277

0.063876

0.049526

0.036046

0.031471

4

C3

0.284513

0.193001

0.146401

0.094322

0.067881

0.064014

0.058648

0.049281

0.036771

0.030222

C4

0.281993

0.195362

0.151036

0.100059

0.074576

0.064812

0.055975

0.043418

0.037553

0.033288

5

C3

0.283255

0.213353

0.141691

0.099827

0.068923

0.061068

0.054877

0.042694

0.036497

0.032595

C4

0.267466

0.209509

0.146054

0.088023

0.064341

0.059269

0.053072

0.045325

0.041158

0.038562

6

C3

0.247931

0.222788

0.145149

0.086555

0.060299

0.051545

0.047428

0.040406

0.038422

0.039497

C4

0.263377

0.219662

0.140129

0.09218

0.073731

0.066121

0.044043

0.038561

0.037834

0.040087

7

C3

0.274277

0.227333

0.143242

0.098828

0.077009

0.077349

0.053042

0.037433

0.034315

0.035758

C4

0.262047

0.220321

0.139138

0.152074

0.092489

0.046808

0.043911

0.042471

0.036621

0.033692

8

C3

0.277704

0.213151

0.146204

0.117269

0.087195

0.054042

0.046417

0.043749

0.036306

0.033417

C4

0.264228

0.214629

0.134168

0.091419

0.072446

0.067568

0.048005

0.037119

0.033455

0.031179

9

C3

0.244206

0.192652

0.138705

0.09586

0.071587

0.063636

0.047559

0.035456

0.029922

0.03341

C4

0.271477

0.195283

0.13229

0.089947

0.065834

0.054977

0.046769

0.03757

0.03753

0.03519

10

C3

0.252086

0.187062

0.128088

0.08718

0.065605

0.055168

0.043624

0.038445

0.03917

0.037403

C4

0.281256

0.185841

0.134085

0.089348

0.07394

0.061189

0.047126

0.039987

0.037028

0.034907

11

C3

0.213606

0.195277

0.136107

0.0906

0.065829

0.055842

0.045491

0.039934

0.036675

0.040311

C4

0.281402

0.202083

0.134252

0.089374

0.074015

0.06119

0.047149

0.039985

0.037039

0.034896

12

C3

0.213606

0.206004

0.136107

0.0906

0.065829

0.055842

0.045491

0.039934

0.036675

0.040311

C4

0.287581

0.214939

0.137479

0.086165

0.06722

0.057057

0.046013

0.039097

0.034978

0.033599

13

C3

0.271985

0.191954

0.130163

0.087518

0.063481

0.054883

0.043709

0.037893

0.035384

0.034527

C4

0.288796

0.202675

0.137267

0.086183

0.067233

0.057072

0.046012

0.039115

0.034983

0.033563

14

C3

0.271918

0.189923

0.130145

0.087506

0.063472

0.054875

0.043702

0.037892

0.035422

0.034497

C4

0.241215

0.187726

0.179171

0.079071

0.066564

0.052436

0.046834

0.041146

0.037551

0.032793

15

C3

0.273562

0.205102

0.159772

0.108804

0.069397

0.05339

0.049006

0.041283

0.03653

0.031436

C4

0.230723

0.199677

0.171124

0.112943

0.071681

0.054471

0.048214

0.043395

0.035691

0.031431

16

C3

0.266072

0.205174

0.158794

0.112727

0.075288

0.063899

0.051795

0.042622

0.031564

0.030497

C4

0.28565

0.199424

0.153393

0.120501

0.074669

0.060145

0.050986

0.037241

0.031459

0.030405

17

C3

0.285836

0.188105

0.154387

0.098184

0.067093

0.063277

0.063876

0.049526

0.036046

0.031471

C4

0.284513

0.19666

0.146401

0.094322

0.067881

0.064014

0.058648

0.049281

0.036771

0.030222

18

C3

0.281993

0.188175

0.151036

0.100059

0.074576

0.064812

0.055975

0.043418

0.037553

0.033288

C4

0.283255

0.196633

0.141691

0.099827

0.068923

0.061068

0.054877

0.042694

0.036497

0.032595

 

Figure 1. Diagrams of the mean number of <N>C3, C4 and <T> C3, C4 (8) for in-band Δf3 oscillatory patterns in EEG channels C3 and C4 estimated from signals recorded in three groups of neonates, respectively.

The white dot in the diagrams corresponds to the median of the data. The width of the diagrams corresponds to the probability distribution of values. Asterisks indicate significant differences between experiments according to the Mann-Whitney U test (p-value≤0.005).

 

The differences in the number <N> and duration <T> of oscillatory patterns P evaluated summarily in the two recorded EEG channels are statistically significant. Thus, each group of newborns is characterized by its own values of the average number and the duration of oscillatory patterns in the frequency band Δf3.

In addition, for a given band Δf3 integral characteristics  and  (7) of patterns, calculated from the two channels of the electroencephalogram C3 and C4, show a clear correlation with the weight of newborns. The corresponding correlation fields are shown in Figure 2; the correlation coefficients between weight and the integral number of  patterns and between weight and the integral duration of  patterns are rw\N=-0.878 and rw\T=0.920.

 

Figure 2. Correlation fields of integral characteristics  and  (9) and neonatal weight. The following color codes are used in the figure: green, blue and red colors show the results of the EEG assessment for participants in group #I, #II and #III, respectively.

 and  (7) were evaluated for oscillatory patterns in the frequency range Δf3. The total number of points in each figure is the same as the number of newborns.

 

Discussion

Modern technical achievements – miniaturization of electronics, active introduction of wireless technologies that eliminate many problems of signal filtering, etc., open many new opportunities for medicine to develop interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of functional signals. However, for obvious reasons, recording the electrical activity of the brain of newborns is still a difficult technical task, primarily due to the impossibility of achieving patient cooperation at this period of life.

The traditional view of neonatal EEG focuses on the visually observable transformation of the EEG from a conventionally «intermittent» to a «continuous» EEG [15-17], while interest in the more detailed characteristics of the brain EEG in adulthood is more varied. In general, today EEG is still used in neonatal care to assess encephalopathy, seizure recognition and classification, to make epilepsy syndrome diagnoses and to assess the maturity of neonatal brain activity. However, neonatal EEG still has a distinct lack of sensitivity in detecting or predicting various mild neurocognitive deficits [18-20].

At the same time, the development of cumbersome technologies that rely on the registration of full EEG recordings combined with other neuroimaging techniques seems to be somewhat of a dead end. Increasing the burden on the primary medical link when conducting such studies will put almost insurmountable obstacles before their actual implementation in clinical practice [21]. In connection with this fact, in the presented study the required number of channels of recorded electroencephalography was reduced to two. It should be noted that the location of these channels in the projection of the central sulcus also seems to be very convenient for installation and fixation of the necessary sensors. The whole proposed algorithm of EEG processing is performed automatically without the need to involve an expert. Of particular importance to the obtained results is the fact that the studied subtle EEG parameters do not depend on the child's sleep/wake state, i. e. they are extremely stable characteristics of brain activity.

Thus, modern science-intensive methods of EEG analysis used in basic science laboratories are at the stage where they can be transferred to the clinical environment for objective assessment of EEG activity. Further adoption of clinical applications is highly dependent on the determined efforts and willingness of the clinical community.

 

Conclusion

In the framework of the presented work, the detection of characteristic features of oscillatory electrical activity of the brain in the first day of postnatal life depending on the weight of newborns was carried out. All newborns were divided among groups 1 (weight: 2850-4000 gr), and 2 (weight: 2000-2800 gr), and 3 (1200-2000 gr). The results of numerical processing of relative short-term monitoring of electrophysiologic activity of newborns demonstrated statistically significant changes in the band [4; 6] Hz for groups 1-3. In addition, the correlation between the characteristics of the oscillatory pattern in this frequency region and the weight of the newborn child was demonstrated. The results obtained can be used for further longitudinal studies of the influence of early features of neurophysiological activity on neurological and neuropsychological development in older age.

 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project 22-22-00517).

 

Authors Contributions

Conceptualization – AЕR; funding acquisition – AER; data curation – YAZ, ENE; resources – AER, YAZ; project administration – AER, YAZ; supervision – EED, YAZ; clinical study – ENE; validation – YAZ, EED; writing-review and editing – AER, YAZ, EED.

 

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References: 
  1. Maenner MJ, Warren Z, Williams AR, Amoakohene E, Bakian AV, Bilder DA, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years – Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ 2023; 72(2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1.
  2. Stevenson NJ, Oberdorfer L, Koolen N, O'Toole JM, Werther T, Klebermass-Schrehof K, et al. Functional maturation in preterm infants measured by serial recording of cortical activity. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 12969. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13537-3.
  3. O'Toole JM, Boylan GB, Vanhatalo S, Stevenson NJ. Estimating functional brain maturity in very and extremely preterm neonates using automated analysis of the electroencephalogram. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 127(8): 2910-2918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.02.024.
  4. Koolen N, Oberdorfer L, Rona Z, Giordano V, Werther T, Klebermass-Schrehof K, et al. Automated classification of neonatal sleep states using EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128(6): 1100-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.02.025.
  5. Pillay K, Dereymaeker A, Jansen K, Naulaers G, Van Huffel S, De Vos M. Automated EEG sleep staging in the term-age baby using a generative modelling approach. J Neural Eng; 15(3): 036004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aaab73.
  6. Kiselev AR, Drapkina OM, Novikov MY, Panina OS, Chernenkov YV, Zhuravlev MO, et al. Examining time-frequency mechanisms of full-fledged deep sleep development in newborns of different gestational age in the first days of their postnatal development. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 21593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26111-3.
  7. Zhuravlev MO, Akimova AS, Panina OS, Kiselev AR. Oscillatory characteristics in the brain activity of the newborns and their correlation with different gestational ages. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics 2023; 31(5): 650-660. Russian. https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-003063.
  8. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310(20), 2191-2194 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
  9. Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. Neuroimage 2007; 34(4): 1600-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.024.
  10. Grossmann A Kronland-Martinet R Morlet J. Reading and Understanding Continuous Wavelet Transforms. In: Combes JM, Grossmann A, Tchamitchian P., Eds Wavelets. Inverse Problems and Theoretical Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1989: 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97177-8_1.
  11. Runnova A, Zhuravlev M, Ukolov R, Blokhina I, Dubrovski A, Lezhnev N, et al. Modified wavelet analysis of ECoG-pattern as promising tool for detection of the blood-brain barrier leakage. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 18505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97427-9
  12. Simonyan M, Fisun A, Afanaseva G, Glushkovskaya-Semyachkina O, Blokhina I, Selskii A, et al. Oscillatory wavelet-patterns in complex data: mutual estimation of frequencies and energy dynamics. Eur Phys J Spec Top 2023; 232(5): 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00737-w.
  13. Zhuravlev MO, Kiselev AR, Runnova AE Study of the characteristics of EEG frequency patterns: the automatic marking of sleep stage without additional physiological signals. In: 2022 International Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS). Saint Petersburg, Russia. 2022: 352-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ITQMIS56172.2022.9976755.
  14. Sergeev K, Runnova A, Zhuravlev M, Kolokolov O, Akimova N, Kiselev A, et al. Wavelet skeletons in sleep EEG-monitoring as biomarkers of early diagnostics of mild cognitive impairment. Chaos 2021;31(7): 073110. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055441.
  15. Lamblin MD, André M, Challamel MJ, Curzi-Dascalova L, d'Allest AM, De Giovanni E, et al. Electroencephalography of the premature and term newborn. Maturational aspects and glossary. Neurophysiol Clin 1999; 29(2): 123-219. French. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0987-7053(99)80051-3.
  16. Scher MS. Electroencephalography of the newborn: normal features. In: Holmes GL, Jones RH, Moshé SL, Eds. Clinical neurophysiology of infancy, childhood, and adolescence. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2006: 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7251-1.50006-X.
  17. Hayakawa M, Okumura A, Hayakawa F, Watanabe K, Ohshiro M, Kato Y, et al. Background electroencephalographic (EEG) activities of very preterm infants born at less than 27 weeks gestation: a study on the degree of continuity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84(3): F163-F167. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.84.3.f163.
  18. De Weerd AW. EEG in neonates. What does the neonatal EEG tell about prognosis? Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 53: 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70167-9.
  19. Richards JE, Parmelee AH Jr, Beckwith L. Spectral analysis of infant EEG and behavioral outcome at age five. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 64(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(86)90037-4.
  20. Scher MS, Steppe DA, Banks DL. Prediction of lower developmental performances of healthy neonates by neonatal EEG-sleep measures. Pediatr Neurol 1996; 14(2): 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-8994(96)00013-6.
  21. Vanhatalo S, Kaila K. Development of neonatal EEG activity: from phenomenology to physiology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 11(6): 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2006.07.008.
About the Authors: 

Anastasiya E. Runnova – DSc, Head of the Department of Medical Biophysics, Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-164X
Yuliya A. Zhuravleva – Assistant of the Department of Medical Biophysics, Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5924-5443.
Evgeniy N. Egorov – PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Biophysics, Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-1077.
Evgeniya E. Drozhdeva – student of the Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5361-378X.

Received 20 June 2023, Revised 11 September 2023, Accepted 18 October 2023 
© 2023, Russian Open Medical Journal
Correspondence to Anastasiya E. Runnova. E-mail: a.e.runnova@gmail.com.

DOI: 
10.15275/rusomj.2023.0407